ミストラルCEO、欧州でAI企業への課税を提案
MistralのCEOは、欧州のAI主権の観点から、欧州のAI企業に課税すべきとの提案を行った。
キーポイント
欧州AI企業への課税提案
MistralのCEOが、欧州のAI企業に対して課税すべきとの提案を行った。
提案の背景にある欧州AI主権
この課税提案は、Mistralが掲げる欧州のAI主権(European AI sovereignty)の立場に基づいている。
政策・規制議論への発言
AI企業のリーダーが、業界の規制や政策に関する具体的な財政措置について公に発言した点が注目される。
重要な引用
Mistral CEO Says AI Companies Should Pay a Tax in Europe
The tax proposal stems from Mistral's stance on European AI sovereignty.
影響分析・編集コメントを表示
影響分析
この発言は、欧州におけるAI規制・産業政策の議論に新たな視点(財政面)を加える可能性がある。ただし、具体的な税制案や実施スキームが示されていないため、現時点では政策議論の一素材としての位置付けとなる。
編集コメント
欧州AI企業のリーダー自らが課税に言及した点は興味深いが、提案内容が抽象的で具体性に欠けるため、現段階では業界内の議論を喚起する発言と評価できる。
この課税案は、Mistralが掲げる欧州のAI主権(AI sovereignty)への立場に基づくものです。
原文を表示
2 Min ReadArthur Mensch, co-founder and CEO of Europe’s biggest AI vendor, says all AI vendors operating in Europe should pay a levy for the content they employ to train their models.Mensch floated his proposal in an opinion piece in The Financial Times on March 20.Paris-based Mistral has made major strides over the past year, positioning itself as the primary alternative to U.S. AI vendors, and placing strong emphasis on data sovereignty for European states.This approach is paying off, with the company attracting significant funding, as seen in its $2 billion Series C funding round last September.Despite this success, Mensch said that Mistral -- and indeed all European AI vendors -- are not competing on a level playing field with American and Chinese companies.“Major US companies in the US and China are developing their models under less than permissive or non-existent copyright rules, training them domestically on vast amounts of content -- including from European sources," he wrote. “European AI developers, by contrast, operate in a fragmented legal environment that places them at a competitive disadvantage.”Related:OpenAI Addresses AI's Effects and Poses Possible Answers in New DocThe situation has been exacerbated, Mensch said, by the fact that the current "opt-out" framework designed to allow rights holders to prevent AI companies from using content for training without permission is proving unworkable.This scenario, according to Mensch, is serving no one, with AI companies hamstrung by legal uncertainty, and content creators taking increasingly high-profile steps to highlight how vendors are using their work with no authorization.However, Mensch has come up with a radical proposal, which would not only go some way toward appeasing creators, but would also address the disadvantage he feels Euro vendors face.“At Mistral, we are proposing a revenue-based levy that would be applied to all commercial providers placing AI models on the market or putting them into service in Europe, reflecting their use of content publicly available online," he wrote. “Crucially, this levy would apply equally to providers based abroad, creating a level playing field within the European market and ensuring that foreign AI companies also contribute when they operate here."Mensch proposed that the funds raised would go into a central pot to support culture and new content creation in Europe, though he did not specify what percentage of revenues should be contributed. However, the Agence France-Presse subsequently quoted Mistral executive Audrey Herblin-Stoop, suggesting a rate of 1% to 1.5%.Related:Trump Administration Releases AI Legislative FrameworkMensch also made clear that his idea is intended as a starting point for discussion rather than a final blueprint, and invited AI developers, policymakers, creators and rights holders to join the debate.Currently, the European Union allows AI companies to use copyrighted materials for text and data mining, including AI training -- except if a creator has “reserved” their rights.About the AuthorContributing WriterGraham Hope has worked in automotive journalism in the U.K. for 26 years, including spells as editor of leading consumer news website and weekly Auto Express and respected buying guide CarBuyer.
関連記事
今日のまとめ
AI日報で今日の重要ニュースをまとめ読み