ドイツ裁判所「AI使用」だけでは著作権無効にならないと判断
本文の状態
日本語全文を表示中
詳細モードで約1分の本文を読めます。
同じ出来事の情報源
この情報源を基点に整理
The Decoder
ドイツの地方裁判所が、SunoAIなどのAIツールで作成された音楽でも、人間が書いた歌詞は著作権で保護されると判決を下した。単に「AI生成」と主張するだけでは保護は剥奪されず、証拠が必要だとしている。
Source Article
元記事を日本語で読む
本文に関係しない購読案内、埋め込み通知、サイト内プロモーションは除いています。

ドイツの地方裁判所は、音楽がSunoAIなどのAIツールで生成された場合でも、人間が作成した歌詞は著作権によって保護されるとの判決を下しました。作品がAI生成であると主張するだけでは、その保護を失わせるには不十分であり、証拠が必要です。
この記事「German court says "It's AI" isn't enough to void copyright」は、The Decoderに最初に掲載されました。
原文を表示
A German regional court has ruled that lyrics written by a person remain protected by copyright, even if the accompanying music was generated by AI - in this case, SunoAI.
The plaintiff wrote the lyrics in April 2025 and handed them to a producer, who then used AI to create a song from them. According to the ruling, the plaintiff continued working on the lyrics during the AI production process and made changes herself.
Another artist asked for the rights to the lyrics, was turned down, but used significant parts of the lyrics in her own song anyway - distributing it on Spotify and other platforms. She even admitted on Twitch that she was going on tour with a song that didn't belong to her. On Instagram, she promoted the track with the words "Come all in before the song gets banned."
Defense claimed AI-generated text can't be copyrighted
In the proceedings, the opposing party argued that the lyrics were entirely AI-generated, backed by an expert opinion from a music specialist. The expert pointed to logical breaks, formulaic sentence structures, and a lack of poetic quality as signs of a machine-generated product. Because of this, the defense claimed there was no copyright and the plaintiff had no grounds to assert any rights.
The court made clear that if someone brings concrete evidence that a work is AI-generated, the other side needs to lay out their creative process in detail. In this case, though, the plaintiff had submitted a credible affidavit saying she wrote the text herself. The court also pointed out that stylistic breaks can be a form of artistic freedom, especially in song lyrics. The expert opinion didn't move the needle.
The court confirmed a temporary injunction against the distribution company and prohibited both the distribution and advertising of the song. The decision is subject to appeal.
Claiming "it's AI" won't easily void copyright
The ruling sets a useful precedent for anyone working with AI tools. Claiming that someone else's content is AI-generated, and therefore free to use, might not hold up without solid proof. At the same time, creators who document their own writing process, including if and how they used AI, have a much stronger position if a dispute ends up in court.
AI News Without the Hype – Curated by Humans
Subscribe to THE DECODER for ad-free reading, a weekly AI newsletter, our exclusive "AI Radar" frontier report six times a year, full archive access, and access to our comment section.
Subscribe now
今日のまとめ
AIデイリーブリーフで今日の重要ニュースをまとめ読み