技術労働者、国防総省と議会にAnthropicのサプライチェーンリスク指定撤回を要請
テックワーカーたちが公開書簡に署名し、国防省に対し、Anthropicを「サプライチェーンリスク」と指定することを撤回し、この問題を静かに解決するよう求めている。
キーポイント
公開書簡による要請
テックワーカーたちが署名した公開書簡で、国防省に対しAnthropicのサプライチェーンリスク指定の撤回を求めている。
指定の撤回と静かな解決を要求
指定の撤回だけでなく、この問題を「静かに解決する」ことを具体的に求めている点が特徴的である。
国防省のサプライチェーンリスク指定
記事は国防省がAnthropicを「サプライチェーンリスク」と指定したことを前提としており、これが論争の起点となっている。
影響分析・編集コメントを表示
影響分析
この記事は、AI企業に対する政府の規制判断が業界関係者から反発を受けるケースを示しており、AI技術の国家安全保障上の扱いを巡る議論の一端を反映している。業界と政府の関係構築の難しさを浮き彫りにしている。
編集コメント
AI企業の政府規制を巡る業界の反応を示す事例として注目されるが、記事の情報量が限られており、背景や詳細な経緯については追加の情報が必要。
テクノロジー業界の労働者たちが公開書簡に署名し、国防総省(DOD)に対し、Anthropicを「サプライチェーンリスク」として指定することを撤回し、代わりにこの問題を静かに解決するよう求めています。
原文を表示
Hundreds of tech workers have signed an open letter urging the Department of Defense to withdraw its designation of Anthropic as a “supply-chain risk.” The letter also calls on Congress to step in and “examine whether the use of these extraordinary authorities against an American technology company is appropriate.”
The letter includes signatories from major technology and venture capital firms, including OpenAI, Slack, IBM, Cursor, Salesforce Ventures, and more. It follows a dispute between the DOD and Anthropic after the AI lab last week refused to give the military unrestricted access to its AI systems.
Anthropic’s two red lines in its negotiations with the Pentagon were that it didn’t want its technology to be used for mass surveillance of Americans or to power autonomous weapons that could target and fire without a human in the loop. The DOD said it had no plans to do either of those things but that it didn’t believe it should be limited by the rules of a vendor.
After Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei declined to reach an agreement with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, President Donald Trump on Friday directed federal agencies to stop using Anthropic’s technology after a six-month transition period. Hegseth then moved to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk — a designation normally reserved for foreign adversaries that would blacklist the AI firm from working with any agency or company that does business with the Pentagon.
In a post on Friday, Hegseth wrote: “Effective immediately, no contractor, supplier, or partner that does business with the United States military may conduct any commercial activity with Anthropic.”
But a post on X does not automatically make Anthropic a supply-chain risk. The government needs to complete a risk assessment and notify Congress before military partners have to cut ties with Anthropic or its products. Anthropic said in a blog post the designation is “legally unsound” and that it would “challenge any supply chain risk designation in court.”
Many in the industry see the administration’s treatment of Anthropic as harsh and clear retaliation.
Techcrunch event
San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026
“When two parties cannot agree on terms, the normal course is to part ways and work with a competitor,” the open letter reads. “This situation sets a dangerous precedent. Punishing an American company for declining to accept changes to a contract sends a clear message to every technology company in America: accept whatever terms the government demands, or face retaliation.”
Beyond concern over the government’s harsh treatment of Anthropic, many in the industry are still concerned about potential government overreach and use of AI for nefarious purposes.
Boaz Barak, an OpenAI researcher, wrote in a social media post on Monday that blocking governments from using AI to do mass domestic surveillance is also his “personal red line” and “it should be all of ours.”
Moments after Trump publicly attacked Anthropic, OpenAI announced it had reached a deal of its own for its models to be deployed in the DOD’s classified environments. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said last week that the firm has the same red lines as Anthropic.
“If anything good can come out of the events of the last week, it would be if we in the AI industry start treating the issue of using AI for government abuse and surveilling its own people as a catastrophic risk of its own right,” Barak wrote. “We have done a good job of evaluations, mitigations, and processes, for risks such as bioweapons and cyber security. Let’s use similar processes here.”
*When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.*
Rebecca Bellan is a senior reporter at TechCrunch where she covers the business, policy, and emerging trends shaping artificial intelligence. Her work has also appeared in Forbes, Bloomberg, The Atlantic, The Daily Beast, and other publications.
You can contact or verify outreach from Rebecca by emailing rebecca.bellan@techcrunch.com or via encrypted message at rebeccabellan.491 on Signal.
関連記事
今日のまとめ
AI日報で今日の重要ニュースをまとめ読み