サム・アルトマン、自宅襲撃と「挑発的」ニューヨーカー記事に応答
OpenAIのCEOサム・アルトマンは、自宅への攻撃と自身の信頼性に疑問を投げかけたニューヨーカー誌の記事に対して、ブログ投稿で応答した。
キーポイント
アルトマンの公式応答
OpenAIのCEOサム・アルトマンが、自宅への攻撃とニューヨーカー誌の記事の両方に対して公式に応答した。
信頼性への疑問
ニューヨーカー誌の記事は、アルトマンのリーダーシップと信頼性について深く掘り下げた内容を含んでいた。
個人と組織への影響
この出来事は、AI業界の主要人物に対する個人攻撃と、組織の評判管理の両方の側面を示している。
影響分析・編集コメントを表示
影響分析
この記事は、AI業界のリーダーに対する個人攻撃とメディアの批判が組み合わさることで、組織の評判管理とリーダーシップの信頼性に影響を与える可能性を示している。特にOpenAIのような先端企業では、CEOの個人像が企業ブランドと強く結びついているため、その影響は無視できない。
編集コメント
AI業界のスターCEOに対する個人攻撃と批判的報道の組み合わせは、技術革新以外の要素が業界形成に与える影響を浮き彫りにしている。企業リーダーのパーソナルブランド管理の重要性が増す中、今後の類似事例の先例となる可能性がある。
OpenAIの最高経営責任者(CEO)による新たなブログ投稿は、彼の自宅に対する明白な襲撃事件と、彼の信頼性に疑問を呈する詳細な『ニューヨーカー』誌の人物評伝の、両方に言及した内容となっている。
原文を表示
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman published a blog post on Friday evening responding to both an apparent attack on his home and an in-depth New Yorker profile raising questions about his trustworthiness.
Early Friday morning, someone allegedly threw a Molotov cocktail at Altman’s San Francisco home. No one was hurt in the incident, and a suspect was later arrested at OpenAI headquarters, where he was threatening to burn down the building, according to the SF Police Department.
While the police have not identified the suspect publicly, Altman noted that the incident came a few days after “an incendiary article” was published about him. He said someone had suggested that the article’s publication “at a time of great anxiety about AI” could make things “more dangerous” for him.
“I brushed it aside,” Altman said. “Now I am awake in the middle of the night and pissed, and thinking that I have underestimated the power of words and narratives.”
The article in question was a lengthy investigative piece written by Ronan Farrow (who won a Pulitzer for reporting that revealed many of the sexual abuse allegations around Harvey Weinstein) and Andrew Marantz (who’s written extensively about technology and politics).
Farrow and Marantz said that during interviews with more than 100 people who have knowledge of Altman’s business conduct, most described Altman as someone with “a relentless will to power that, even among industrialists who put their names on spaceships, sets him apart.”
Echoing other journalists who have profiled Altman, Farrow and Marantz suggested that many sources raised questions about his trustworthiness, with one anonymous board member saying he combines “a strong desire to please people, to be liked in any given interaction” with “a sociopathic lack of concern for the consequences that may come from deceiving someone.”
Techcrunch event
San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026
In his response, Altman said that looking back, he can identify “a lot of things I’m proud of and a bunch of mistakes.”
Among the mistakes, he said, is a tendency toward “being conflict-averse,” which he said has “caused great pain for me and OpenAI.”
“I am not proud of handling myself badly in a conflict with our previous board that led to a huge mess for the company,” Altman said, presumably referring to his removal and rapid reinstatement as OpenAI CEO back in 2023. “I have made many other mistakes throughout the insane trajectory of OpenAI; I am a flawed person in the center of an exceptionally complex situation, trying to get a little better each year, always working for the mission.”
He added, “I am sorry to people I’ve hurt and wish I had learned more faster.”
Altman also acknowledged that there seems to be “so much Shakespearean drama between the companies in our field,” which he attributed to a “‘ring of power’ dynamic” that “makes people do crazy things.”
Of course, the correct way to deal with the ring of power is to destroy it, so Altman added, “I don’t mean that [artificial general intelligence] is the ring itself, but instead the totalizing philosophy of ‘being the one to control AGI.’” His proposed solution is “to orient towards sharing the technology with people broadly, and for no one to have the ring.”
Altman concluded by saying that he welcomes “good-faith criticism and debate,” while reiterating his belief that “technological progress can make the future unbelievably good, for your family and mine.”
“While we have that debate, we should de-escalate the rhetoric and tactics and try to have fewer explosions in fewer homes, figuratively and literally,” he said.
Anthony Ha is TechCrunch’s weekend editor. Previously, he worked as a tech reporter at Adweek, a senior editor at VentureBeat, a local government reporter at the Hollister Free Lance, and vice president of content at a VC firm. He lives in New York City.
You can contact or verify outreach from Anthony by emailing anthony.ha@techcrunch.com.
View Bio
関連記事
教育におけるChatGPTの有用性を主張した研究が撤回される
Springer Nature は、OpenAI の ChatGPT が学習成果にプラスの影響を与えると主張した研究について、分析上の不整合と結論への信頼性欠如を理由に撤回を発表しました。この論文は出版後約1年で数百件の引用を集め、SNS でも話題となりましたが、著者による注目すべき主張には問題があったことが判明しました。
Nature が ChatGPT の教育効果に関する論文を撤回
学術誌 Nature は、AI が学生の学習成績や思考力にプラスの影響を与えると主張したメタ分析論文を撤回しました。この論文は 5 月に発表され、ChatGPT の教育的利点を示す根拠として引用されていましたが、調査の結果問題が発覚し取り下げられました。
OpenAI、Codex にアニメーションペットと設定ファイル自動インポート機能を追加
OpenAI は開発ツール「Codex」を更新し、画面にオーバーレイ表示されるアニメーションペット機能や、他コードエージェントからの設定ファイル自動インポート、音声入力精度向上のための辞書機能を追加した。これによりデスクトップアプリとしての利便性と魅力が強化された。